Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCAFC 126 Citation: Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCAFC 126
Appeal from: Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd v Apotex Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 846
Parties: APOTEX PTY LTD (ACN 096 916 148) v SANOFI-AVENTIS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 008 558 807), SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH and AVENTISUB II INCORPORATED
File number(s): NSD 2133 of 2011
Judge(s): BENNETT AND YATES JJ
Date of judgment: 26 September 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – respondents successful at first instance and before the Full Court – appellant successful on infringement before the High Court – whether costs should follow the event or be assessed on an issues basis – percentage reduction of entitlement to costs
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law 2011 (Cth), s 18 Therapeutic Goods Legislation Amendment (Copyright) Act 2011 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52
Cases cited: Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 50 DSI Australia (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Garford Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 268 H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 118 PAC Mining Pty Ltd v Esco Corporation (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 52
Date of hearing: On the papers
Date of last submissions: 6 March 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate