Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Letten v Templeton [2014] FCAFC 131 Citation: Letten v Templeton [2014] FCAFC 131
Appeal from: Application for leave to Appeal: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 22) [2014] FCA 681
Parties: MARK RONALD LETTEN v DAMIAN JOHN TEMPLETON and PHILIP HENNESSY (IN THEIR CAPACITY AS COURT APPOINTED RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS)
File number: VID 376 of 2014
Judges: BESANKO, DAVIES AND WHITE JJ
Date of judgment: 3 October 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application under s 24(1A) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to appeal from interlocutory judgment – whether proposed appeal is competent – matters to be taken into account when a non-party seeks leave to appeal from an interlocutory judgment
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 601ED Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24
Cases cited: Ah Toy v Registrar of Companies (1985) 61 ALR 583; [1985] FCA 237 Anying Group Pty Ltd v Wang [2012] FCA 702 Ashby v Slipper (2011) 281 ALR 38; [2014] FCAFC 15 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten [2010] FCA 140 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 7) (2010) 190 FCR 59; [2010] FCA 1231 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 10) [2011] FCA 498 Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 334 Commonwealth v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2000) 171 ALR 379; [2000] FCA 453 DÉcor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries (1991) 33 FCR 397; [1991] FCA 655 Driclad Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1968) 121 CLR 45 Fortress Credit Corporation (Australia) II Pty Ltd v Fletcher [2011] FCAFC 89 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated v His Eminence Petar The Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand [2008] 237 CLR 66; [2008] HCA 42 Mellifont v Attorney-General for the State of Queensland (1991) 173 CLR 289 Moller v Roy (1975) 132 CLR 622 O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 232 Re Atkinson [1971] VR 612 Re Judiciary and Navigation Acts (1921) 29 CLR 257 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate