Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ghanem v Australian Research Council [2014] FCAFC 132 Citation: Ghanem v Australian Research Council [2014] FCAFC 132
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Ghanem v Australian Research Council [2014] FCA 473
Parties: ASHRAF GHANEM v AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH COUNCIL and MINISTER FOR EDUCATION
File number(s): ACD 33 of 2014
Judge(s): FLICK, JAGOT AND PERRY JJ
Date of judgment: 7 October 2014
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – leave to appeal – summary dismissal – unrepresented applicant – claim inadequately pleaded – inconsistent claims – whether claim could be subject of any meaningful relief – whether substantial injustice to applicant if leave refused
Legislation: Australian Research Council Act 2001 (Cth) Pt 7 Div 1 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 3 FCR 397 Spencer v Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Sutton v Commissioner of Taxation (1959) 100 CLR 518 White Industries Aust Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 160 FCR 298; [2007] FCA 511
Date of hearing: 1 October 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr J Davidson of Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate