Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 139 Citation: Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 139
Appeal from: Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Limited [2013] FCA 102 Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 359
Parties: REBECCA RICHARDSON v ORACLE CORPORATION AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 003 074 468) and RANDOL TUCKER
File number: NSD 438 of 2013
Judges: KENNY, BESANKO & PERRAM JJ
Date of judgment: 27 October 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – claim for indemnity costs based on letter of compromise – applicability of Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) – whether circumstances to justify departure from presumption of entitlement to indemnity costs – effect of Full Court's reassessment of appropriate range of damages PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for pre-judgment interest
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A(1) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 23 r 4, O 23 r 11 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 1.04
Cases cited: Elecspess Pty Ltd v LED Technologies Pty Ltd (2013) 215 FCR 95 cited Maitland Hospital v Fisher (No 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 721 cited Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 cited Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Braverus Maritime Inc (No 2) (2004) 212 ALR 281 cited Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 312 ALR 285 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate