Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lee v Commonwealth of Australia [2014] FCAFC 174 Citation: Lee v Commonwealth of Australia [2014] FCAFC 174
Appeal from: Lee v Commonwealth of Australia [2014] FCA 432
Parties: DANIEL LEE and GRAEME PETER JAMES GROPLER v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and MURRAY-DARLING BASIN AUTHORITY
File number: VID 274 of 2014
Judges: MIDDLETON, BARKER AND GRIFFITHS JJ
Date of judgment: 18 December 2014
Catchwords: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against summary dismissal of claim pursuant to s 31A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – challenge to validity of provisions of Water Act 2007 (Cth) and claim for damages as a result of impairment by abridgment or acquisition of water entitlements and allocations – proper approach to interpretation of ss 99 and 100 Constitution in light of Morgan v Commonwealth (1947) 74 CLR 421 and subsequent decisions – whether primary judge erred in finding that impugned provisions of Water Act 2007 (Cth) could not be characterised as a law relating to trade or commerce under s 51(i) Constitution – whether primary judge erred in finding that claim under s 92 Constitution had no reasonable prospects of success – whether primary judge erred in finding that appellants had no reasonable prospect of prosecuting claim for acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms under s 254 Water Act 2007 (Cth) and s 51(xxxi) Constitution – whether primary judge should have found that claim under s 100 Constitution did not involve a relevant "matter"
Legislation: Commonwealth Constitution s 51(i), s 51(xxix), s 51(xxxi), s 92, s 98, s 99, s 100, s 101, s 102 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A)(b), s 44, s 78B Water Act 2007 (Cth) Pt 1, Pt 2, Pt 2A, Pt 6, Pt 8, Pt 9, Pt 10, Pt 10A, Pt 11, Pt 11A, Pt 12, s 3(d)(i), s 4, s 11, s 18A, s 19(2), s 20(e), s 22(1) (items 2, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12), s 22(3), s 22(3)(b), s 22(3)(c), s 22(3)(g), s 23, s 24, s 25(1)(a), s 25(1)(b), s 26, s 34, s 35, s 35(1), s 36(3), s 37(3), s 39, s 41, s 60(3), s 61(3), s 63(1), s 63(6), s 68, s 69, s 73(14)(d)(iv), s 104, s 105(1), s 105(2), s 105(3), s 105(4), s 106, s 140, s 144, s 146, s 163, s 164, s 165(1)(b), s 165(1)(c), s 165(3), s 166(1), s 241, s 241(1)(b), s 242, s 242(1), s 242(3), s 243(1), s 244(1), s 245(2), s 254, Sch 1A, Sch 3 (cl 3, cl 4), Sch 4 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 16.21 Water Amendment Regulation (No 1) 2012 (Cth) Water Amendment Regulation (No 2) 2012 (Cth) Water Act 1989 (Vic) Water Management Act 2000 (NSW) s 71Z
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate