Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Appeal from: Stretton v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] FCA 559
File number: QUD 508 of 2015
Judges: ALLSOP CJ, GRIFFITHS AND WIGNEY JJ
Date of judgment: 15 February 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review of Minister's decision to cancel respondent's visa on character grounds pursuant to s 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where respondent convicted of child sex offences – where respondent had been an Australian resident for vast majority of his life with deep family connections – whether exercise of discretion legally unreasonable – whether primary judge's decision correctly characterised Minister's decision as legally unreasonable – whether decision of Minister a lawful exercise of power that was not arbitrary, capricious or irrational – Appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 4, 496, 499, 500(1)(b), 501, 501(1), 501(2), 501(3), 501(6), 501G(1)(e) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D
Cases cited: Abebe v The Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14; 197 CLR 510 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; 170 CLR 321 Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1949] HCA 26; 78 CLR 353 Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83; 231 FCR 513 Boucaut Bay Company Limited (in liq) v The Commonwealth [1927] HCA 59; 40 CLR 98 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833; 117 FCR 424 Buck v Bavone [1976] HCA 24; 135 CLR 110 Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Brian Hatch Timber Co (Sales) Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 73; 128 CLR 28 Council of the Municipality of Bankstown v Fripp [1919] HCA 41; 26 CLR 385 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kruger v The Commonwealth [1997] HCA 27; 190 CLR 1 Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91 McCloy v New South Wales [2015] HCA 34; 325 ALR 15 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; 212 FCR 99 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; 197 CLR 611 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 38; 220 FCR 1 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50 R v Anderson; Ex parte Ipec-Air Pty Ltd [1965] HCA 27; 113 CLR 177 R v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd [1944] HCA 42; 69 CLR 407 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex Parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; 198 ALR 59; 77 ALJR 1165 Re Patterson; ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51; 207 CLR 391 Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1977] AC 1014 Sharp v Wakefield [1891] AC 173 Shrimpton v The Commonwealth [1945] HCA 4; 69 CLR 613 South Australian Commissioner for Prices and Consumer Affairs v Charles Moore (Aust) Limited [1977] HCA 38; 139 CLR 449 Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (NSW) v Browning [1947] HCA 21; 74 CLR 492
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate