Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 22 Appeal from: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 986
File number: NSD 2154 of 2013
Judge: NICHOLAS, YATES AND WIGNEY JJ
Date of judgment: 4 March 2016
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – infringement – whether primary judge erred in dismissing claims for trade mark infringement – whether evidence permitted finding that trade marks infringed – test of substantial identicality – need for "side by side" comparison – whether primary judge erred in holding that test incapable of application due to lack of direct evidence – trade mark use – whether trade mark used so as to indicate a connection in course of trade – whether trade mark use occurs if person applying trade mark without authority of registered owner intends to indicate connection between registered goods and the registered owner – whether use occurred in course of trade – whether infringing use INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – common design – common design to engage in conduct that constitutes infringement of intellectual property rights – where participants acting in concert – whether necessary to establish intention to infringe – whether sufficient that participants acted in concert to engage in conduct that amounts to infringement – injunctive relief – where injunctive relief granted against individual respondent –where corporate respondent alter ego of individual respondent – whether injunctive relief should also be granted against corporate respondent behind which individual respondent stands – where risk that corporate respondent will act as a mere cloak behind which individual respondent will continue to infringe
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate