Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30 Appeal from: ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 2047
File number: NSD 1048 of 2015
Judges: ALLSOP CJ, KENNY AND GRIFFITHS JJ
Date of judgment: 10 March 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – judicial review application under s 39B of the Judicial Act 1903 (Cth) – conduct of legal representatives – costs. MIGRATION – whether primary judge denied applicant procedural fairness by refusing to disqualify himself based on reasonable apprehension of bias - whether comparative statistical analysis of Court's previous decisions relevant to apprehended bias test. Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), ss 39B, 37N(5), 43(3)(f) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 477(2), 477(2)(b) Cases cited: AAV15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 700; (2015) 230 FCR 454 ABT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 1051 ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 2047 ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] FCCA 2048 AEG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 702; (2015) 230 FCR 465 AHT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1215 British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2; (2011) 242 CLR 283 Concrete Pty Limited v Parramatta Design and Developments Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 55; (2006) 229 CLR 577 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Kautoga v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] FCCA 1679 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association [1983] HCA 17; (1983) 151 CLR 288 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; (2001) 205 CLR 507 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong [1976] HCA 39; (1976) 136 CLR 248 SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 24; (2005) 228 CLR 294 Sekigawa v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 127 Shrestha v Migration Review Tribunal [2015] FCAFC 87; (2015) 229 FCR 301 SZUQZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 1552 SZWBH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 88; (2015) 229 FCR 317 SZWCW v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1217 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488 Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20 Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1865; (2001) 115 FCR 229 Vietnam Veterans' Association of Australia (New South Wales Branch Inc) v Gallagher [1994] FCA 489; (1994) 52 FCR 34
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate