Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTEO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 44 Appeal from: SZTEO v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 2228
File number(s): NSD 1075 of 2015
Judge(s): BUCHANAN, REEVES AND BROMBERG JJ
Date of judgment: 21 March 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether the appellant would need to conceal his identity if visa not granted and he was returned – whether Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 applies
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36, 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa)
Cases cited: Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSCA (2014) 254 CLR 317 Plaintiff M76/2013 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship (2013) 251 CLR 322 Plaintiff S4/2014 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 253 CLR 219
Date of hearing: 11 February 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms T Baw (Pro Bono)
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T Reilly
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate