Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
State of Western Australia v Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People [2016] FCAFC 47 Appeal from: Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 516 Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 700 Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 1247
File numbers: WAD 379 of 2014 WAD 381 of 2014 WAD 382 of 2014
Judges: MANSFIELD, DOWSETT AND JAGOT JJ
Date of judgment: 29 March 2016
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – whether mining leases valid future acts pursuant to ss 24IB or 24IC of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether mining leases granted under Mining Act 1904 (WA) or governmental agreement – mining leases granted under Mining Act 1904 (WA) – government agreement had the force of creating contractual obligations and rights between the parties – re-grant of mining leases constituted a valid future act under s 24IC of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – appeal allowed NATIVE TITLE – form of native title determination whether paragraph 8A(c) of native title determination complied with requirements of ss 94A and 225 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – no error– cross-appeal dismissed NATIVE TITLE – condition precedent to the grant of mining leases under Mining Act 1904 (WA) – parties agree paragraph included in native title determination in error – appeal allowed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate