Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MZAEU v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 100 Appeal from: MZAEU v Minister for Immigration [2015] FCCA 2612
File number: VID 652 of 2015
Judges: NORTH, RANGIAH AND MOSHINSKY JJ
Date of judgment: 5 August 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – application for protection visa – whether Tribunal's decision affected by jurisdictional error – whether Tribunal failed to consider claim that it would be unreasonable to relocate because of lack of traditional support mechanisms – whether reasonable apprehension of bias
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 414(1)
Cases cited: Applicant NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 221 CLR 1 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie (2011) 242 CLR 283 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 Livesy v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQHH (2012) 200 FCR 223 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang (2003) 215 CLR 518 MZZIG v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2013] FCCA 1236 MZZQV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 533 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte H (2001) 179 ALR 425 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate