Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Teys Australia Beenleigh Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union [2016] FCAFC 122 Appeal from: Teys Australia Beenleigh Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (No 2) [2016] FCA 2
File number: QUD 67 of 2016
Judges: JESSUP, TRACEY AND BARKER JJ
Date of judgment: 9 September 2016
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – enterprise agreement – provision permitting "parties" to agree on terms and conditions for remuneration of employees different from those set out in agreement – employer and relevant union did so agree – whether enterprise agreement effectively varied thereby.
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 46AA Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 49, 172, 180, 181, 182, 185, 186, 187, 189, 190, 192, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 216, 257, 570
Cases cited: Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v Marmara (2014) 222 FCR 152
Date of hearing: 3 August 2016
Registry: Queensland
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 31
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr D Williams with Mr P Zielinski of Minter Ellison
Solicitor for the Appellant: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T Bradley QC with Ms A Coulthard
Solicitor for the First Respondent: E Dalgleish of the Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS QUD 67 of 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate