Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fard v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 155 Appeal from: Fard v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 417
File number: ACD 39 of 2016
Judges: COLLIER, KATZMANN AND FARRELL JJ
Date of judgment: 15 November 2016
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal) – application under s 48 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (the FOI Act) – appellant sought to have personal records held by the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (the Department) amended – appellant claimed records incorrectly recorded a person as appellant's son – Tribunal summarily dismissed appellant's application for review of her FOI application as no reasonable prospects of success – appellant lodged application for review of decision of Tribunal in the Federal Court on the basis that she was denied procedural fairness – information about the meaning of visa codes K4551 and K4552 – primary Judge dismissed appellant's application to review decision of Tribunal as no procedural unfairness – whether decision of primary Judge was "unjust and unfair" – whether Department failed to comply with directions of Tribunal to provide appellant with information about the relevant visa codes – whether Tribunal failed to address Department's non-compliance with directions of Tribunal – meaning of visa codes K4551 and K4552 – appellant claimed visa codes related to gender of visa recipient – appeal dismissed COSTS – security for costs previously paid into Court – whether costs should be awarded in lump-sum amount or taxed – s 37M Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – lump sum awarded in amount paid by appellant as security
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate