Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd v Fairlight.Au Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCAFC 191 Appeal from: Fairlight.AU Pty Ltd v Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] FCA 1422
File number: NSD 99 of 2016
Judges: BESANKO, EDELMAN AND BURLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 22 December 2016
Cases cited: Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd v Fairlight.Au Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 172
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 19 December 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr M Green SC and Mr G E Babe
Solicitor for the Appellant: Clear Lawyers
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Kalus Kenny Intelex
ORDERS NSD 99 of 2016
BETWEEN: PETER VOGEL INSTRUMENTS PTY LTD
(ACN 140 173 397) Appellant
AND: FAIRLIGHT.AU PTY LTD (ACN 104 307 888) First Respondent
KFT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 005 144 945) Second Respondent
JUDGES: BESANKO, EDELMAN AND BURLEY JJ DATE OF ORDER: 22 DECEMBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondents pay 50% of the appellant's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate