Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Central Queensland Services Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 43 Review of: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Central Queensland Services Pty Ltd T/A BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance [2017] FWCFB 288
File numbers: QUD 146 of 2016 QUD 194 of 2016
Judges: JESSUP, TRACEY AND REEVES jJ
Date of judgment: 10 March 2017
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – construction of s 492(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – where there was no agreed location for interviews or discussions by permit holders under s 492(1) – whether "purpose" of the "default location" in s 492(3)(b) requires the single or sole purpose of the room or area to be taking meal or other breaks – whether "purpose" in s 492(3)(b) requires a determination of the occupier's subjective intentions in providing the room or area – consideration of whether the purposes of right of entry provisions in Part 3-4 of the Act include preventing the interference of the performance of work PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – remedies – whether certiorari is available to quash a decision by the Full Bench of the Commission where no orders were made
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 484, 490, 492, 492A, 500
Cases cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27; [2009] HCA 41 Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Fair Work Australia (2012) 203 FCR 389 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd (2001) 115 FCR 442; [2001] FCA 1800 Australian Crime Commission v AA Pty Ltd (2006) 149 FCR 540; [2006] FCAFC 30 Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2007) 228 CLR 651; [2007] HCA 14 Certain Lloyd's Underwriters Subscribing to Contract No IH00AAQS v Cross (2012) 248 CLR 378, [2012] HCA 56 Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (ACN 009 071 167) (2012) 293 ALR 257; [2012] HCA 55 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Limited (1972) 127 CLR 421 Hayes v Willoughby [2013] 1 WLR 935; [2013] UKSC 17 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Tamas v Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (2003) 9 VR 154; [2003] VSCA 113 Thiess v Collector of Customs (2014) 250 CLR 664; [2014] HCA 12 Valuer-General v Fivex Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 53 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate