Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd v Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 100 File number: NSD 383 of 2016
Judges: ALLSOP CJ, MIDDLETON AND BROMWICH JJ
Date of judgment: 21 June 2017
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – separate question pursuant to r 30.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – in proceedings brought for the imposition of a civil penalty for a contravention of s 1041A or s 1041B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code being the Schedule to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) engaged, subject to any contrary indication in the Corporations Act 2001 as to any specific provision thereof? – textual analysis – historical analysis – answer to separate question: no
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 631, 727, 1041A, 1041B, 1308A, 1311, 1317DA, 1317E, 1317F, 1317G, 1317J, 1317M, 1317N, 1317P, 1324, Sch 3 Criminal Code, Ch 2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 30.01
Cases cited: Alqudsi v The Queen [2016] HCA 24; 258 CLR 203 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mariner Corporation Ltd [2015] FCA 589; 241 FCR 502 Australian Securities Commission v Nomura International plc (1998) 89 FCR 301 Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; 253 CLR 58 Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd [2012] HCA 55; 250 CLR 503 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 326 ALR 476 Gore v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2017] FCAFC 13; 341 ALR 189 Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission v May [2016] HCA 19; 257 CLR 468 North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Ltd v Northern Territory [2015] HCA 41; 256 CLR 569 North v Marra Developments Limited (1981) 148 CLR 42 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 R v Byrnes (1995) 183 CLR 501 R v JS [2007] NSWCCA 272; 230 FLR 276 Re Tasmanian Spastics Association; Australian Securities Commission v Nandan (1997) 23 ACSR 743 Thiess v Collector of Customs [2014] HCA 12; 250 CLR 664
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate