Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113 File number: QUD 257 of 2013
Judges: DOWSETT, GREENWOOD AND WIGNEY JJ
Date of judgment: 3 August 2017
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) – unlawful industrial action – admitted contraventions – civil penalties – where parties provided agreed range as to penalties – where difficulty identifying precise number of contraventions – whether permissible and appropriate to impose a single penalty in respect of multiple contraventions – course of conduct principle – totality principle
Legislation: Constitution, s 51(xx) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), ss 2C, 23 Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) (repealed), ss 4, 36(1), 36(3)(b), 37, 38, 40, 43, 44, 45, 48(1)(a), 48(2), 49, 49(1), 49(2), 49(6), 69(1)(b) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 76(3), 76E(4) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law), ss 18, 29(1)(a), 33 Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth), ss 386-1, 386-10(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 4AA Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 191 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 12, 298P(2), 546(1), 546(2), 557 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 20(1A), 21 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (repealed), ss 45, 52, 53, 53C Work Relations Act 1966 (Cth) (repealed), s 187AA(1)(a)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate