Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 124 Application from: Application by Glencore Coal Pty Ltd [2016] ACompT 6 Application by Glencore Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] ACompT 7
File number: NSD 1147 of 2016
Judges: DOWSETT, BESANKO, MIDDLETON, FOSTER AND GRIFFITHS JJ
Date of judgment: 16 August 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – consideration of an application for judicial review of a decision made by the Australian Competition Tribunal – where the Tribunal made an order setting aside a decision of the Minister not to declare a service under s 44H of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and made an order declaring a service pursuant to s 44K(8) of the Act. COMPETITION – consideration of the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Sydney Airport Corporation Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal and Others (2006) 155 FCR 124 – where declaration relates to services provided by coal port infrastructure facilities – scope of s 44H(4)(a) and of s 44H(4)(f) – where ordinary meaning of "access" in the context of access to a service is a right or ability to use a service – where the exercise of power under s 44H calls for a comparison between the future state of competition in a dependent market with access and no access to the service or with increased access and restricted access to the service. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of the second respondent's use of a Notice of Contention pursuant to r 36.24 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the Tribunal is not a "court appealed from" and the applicant has not served a "notice of appeal" within r 36.24 – where no judicially reviewable error is made out.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate