Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZVCZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 130 Appeal from: SZVCZ v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2840
File number: NSD 1963 of 2016
Judges: SIOPIS, LOGAN AND MARKOVIC JJ
Date of judgment: 18 August 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – refusal of application for protection visa – whether particular information was relied on by the Tribunal – whether such information was "information" within the meaning of s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – requirement to give applicant information which is the reason or part of the reason for affirming the decision under review – whether if such information was "information" within the meaning of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) it was information not specifically about the applicant or another person within the meaning of s 424A(3)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Tribunal should have specifically put information to the appellant – no jurisdictional error
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 424A, 424A(1), 424A(3)(a)
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZHXF (2008) 166 FCR 298 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZLFX (2009) 238 CLR 507 MZXBQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 166 FCR 483 Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 113 FCR 396 SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609 SZKLG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 164 FCR 578 SZQQA v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection (2014) 293 FLR 243; [2014] FCCA 1923 VAF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 236 FCR 549
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate