Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lewski v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 145 File number: VID 1496 of 2016
Judges: PERRAM, PAGONE AND MOSHINSKY JJ
Date of judgment: 18 September 2017
Catchwords: TAXATION – income tax – deductions – when loss or outgoing is "incurred" – contracts for sale and purchase of land and for sale and purchase of aged care hostel business – whether certain amounts were incurred by purchaser upon execution of contracts – whether Tribunal erred in concluding that the amounts were not incurred upon execution of contracts TAXATION – income tax – taxation of trusts – discretionary trust – where trustee resolved to distribute income to particular beneficiary but also resolved to distribute the income to a different beneficiary if the Commissioner disallowed a deduction or included an additional amount in assessable income – whether resolutions were valid – whether variation resolution, if invalid, was severable – whether first-mentioned beneficiary was "presently entitled" to a share of the income of the trust estate TAXATION – review proceedings under Pt IVC of Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – application by taxpayer to rely on grounds not in objection – principles applicable TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES – discretionary trust – distribution of income – where beneficiary executed deed of disclaimer – whether disclaimer effective – whether beneficiary had already accepted the distribution – whether knowledge of beneficiary's agent should be imputed to beneficiary TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES – discretionary trust – resolution of trustee to distribute income – where resolution expressed in terms of "income" of the trust – where distribution power in trust deed expressed in terms of "Net Income" – whether on its true construction the resolution related to Net Income of the trust
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate