Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wozniak v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 148 File number: NSD 645 of 2017
Judge: KENNY, GRIFFITHS & BROMWICH JJ
Date of judgment: 21 September 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for leave to appeal out of time from orders dismissing application for judicial review – decision not to revoke mandatory cancellation of visa – character test – substantial criminal record – s 501(3A) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – application dismissed with proposed "Falzon" ground stood over for determination after High Court decision ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – alleged denial of procedural fairness – alleged failure to make an obvious inquiry about a critical fact – failure of decision-maker to obtain pre-sentence report in relation to risk of re-offending – practical injustice – failure to exercise jurisdiction – held: no obligation to obtain pre-sentence report in all the circumstances – held: no practical injustice or breach of procedural fairness – held: limited obligation upon administrative decision-maker to make inquiries – held: no jurisdictional error by failure to exercise jurisdiction – held: leave to appeal on both proposed new appeal grounds refused ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – use of word "privilege" in reasons of the decision-maker in relation to status of visa-holder – alleged jurisdictional error – whether decision in Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Tesic [2017] FCAFC 93 should be followed or await outcome of application for special leave to appeal – held: Tesic decision followed; no delay pending High Court special leave application appropriate – held: leave to appeal on proposed appeal ground refused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate