Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 150 File numbers: VID 751 of 2017 VID 762 of 2017
Judges: BESANKO, PERRAM & ROBERTSON JJ
Date of judgment: 20 September 2017
Catchwords: COMPETITION – merger clearances and authorisations – authorisation granted by Australian Competition Tribunal for merger – Tribunal satisfied that proposed acquisition would result, or be likely to result, in such a benefit to public that acquisition should be allowed to occur – proper construction of s 95AZH of Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) – consideration of relationship between test in s 95AZH and concept of 'substantial lessening of competition' in s 50 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether Tribunal misconstrued and misapplied s 95AZH by importing test from s 50 – whether failure to take into account relevant considerations – whether Tribunal erred in law by failing to deal with a central issue raised by party to application – whether Tribunal required to compare likely future state of competition with and without proposed acquisition – whether Tribunal required to assign lesser weight to benefits flowing from proposed acquisition not likely to be widely shared – whether Tribunal made irrational and illogical findings
Legislation: Constitution s 92 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5(1)(c), 5(1)(d), 5(1)(e), 5(1)(f), 5(1)(j), 5(2)(b), 5(2)(g), 16(1)(a) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 50, 95AT, 95AT(2), 95AZH, 95AZH(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate