Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CrownBet Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 160 File number: VID 762 of 2017
Judges: BESANKO, PERRAM & ROBERTSON JJ
Date of judgment: 10 October 2017
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 150 CrownBet Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 157
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Economic Regulator, Competition and Access
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Borsky QC with Mr A Barraclough
Solicitor for the Applicant Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr C Moore SC with Mr N De Young and Mr B Lim
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Herbert Smith Freehills
Counsel for the Third Respondent: Mr R Smith SC with Mr G Ng
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Clayton Utz
ORDERS VID 762 of 2017
BETWEEN: CROWNBET PTY LTD Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL First Respondent
TABCORP HOLDINGS LIMITED Second Respondent TATTS GROUP LIMITED Third Respondent
JUDGES: BESANKO, PERRAM & ROBERTSON JJ DATE OF ORDER: 10 October 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the respondents' costs, as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate