Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shord v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 167 Appeal from: Shord v Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCA 761
File number(s): WAD 332 of 2016
Judge(s): SIOPIS, LOGAN AND WHITE JJ
Date of judgment: 26 October 2017
Catchwords: TAXATION – the appellant worked on assignments overseas – the appellant returned to Australia between assignments – whether the appellant was engaged in foreign service within the meaning of s 23AG(7) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) and thereby exempt from income tax – whether the appellant was entitled to tax offsets for foreign income tax paid pursuant to s 770-10(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – whether the appellant was an "employee" under s 23AG(7) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. TAXATION – onus of proof – Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), s 14ZZK(b) – whether there was a duty upon the Commissioner of Taxation under s 33(1AA) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) to assist in obtaining evidence of the payment of tax by the appellant in foreign countries. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - review by Administrative Appeals Tribunal of objection decision of the Commissioner of Taxation – the Commissioner advised the Tribunal at the hearing that he no longer pursued a contention in the statement of facts and contentions – the appellant's representative nevertheless adduced evidence and made submissions on that contention – the Tribunal found against the appellant on that contention – whether there was a denial of procedural fairness.
Legislation: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 6(1), 23AG, 23AG(1), 23AG(6), 23AG(6)(a), 23AG(6A), 23AG(7), 177F(1), 166 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Div 770, ss 770-10, 770-10(1) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 2A, 33, 33(1AA), 33(1AB), 37, 37(1), 37(1)(b), 44 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 14ZZK, 14ZZK(b), 15 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 55ZF Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 33.03
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate