Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 184 Appeal from: Kaur & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 844
File number: VID 406 of 2017
Judges: DOWSETT, PAGONE, BURLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 27 November 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for skilled visa – public interest criterion 4020 – evidence of provision of "bogus document" to assessing authority – whether the Tribunal misconceived its function or misapplied public interest criterion 4020(4) – whether Tribunal erred by failing to undertake inquiries – whether Tribunal should have exercised power to summons witness – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 363 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: AB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 910; (2007) 96 ALD 53 Le v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 875 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le [2007] FCA 1318; (2007) 164 FCR 151 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; (2009) 259 ALR 429 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20; (1995) 183 CLR 273 MZZGB v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1052 Paduano v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 211; (2005) 143 FCR Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; (2003) 214 CLR 1 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1285 Snedden v Minister for Justice [2014] FCAFC 156; (2014) 230 FCR 82 SZMJM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 309
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate