Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 195 Appeal from: Application for extension of time and leave to appeal: Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCCA 1109
File number(s): NSD 994 of 2017
Judge(s): PERRAM, FARRELL AND PERRY JJ
Date of judgment: 29 November 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed decision to refuse to grant the appellant a student visa under Public Interest Criterion 4020(1) (bogus document) – whether Tribunal failed to consider claim for waiver of PIC 4020(1)
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Schedule 2 clause 572.224, Schedule 4 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.03
Cases cited: Aurora v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 35; (2016) 238 FCR 153 BAO15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 214 at [19] CTV15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 976 at [12] Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 at 348–349 MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1391 MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 110 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate