Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bailey v Broadsword Marine Contractors Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 219 Appeal from: Bailey v Broadsword Marine Contractors Pty Ltd [2016] AATA 1048
File number: QUD 21 of 2017
Judges: RARES, REEVES AND DERRINGTON JJ
Date of judgment: 22 December 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether the appellant had suffered an "injury" under the Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 (Cth) – distinction between "disease" and "injury" in its primary sense considered – effect of "sudden" or "dramatic" change considered – exclusionary effect of s 10(7) of the Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 (Cth) considered ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether the appellant had suffered an "injury" under the Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 (Cth) – whether the adjustment disorders were the same disease – whether the appellant made a "wilful" and "false" representation ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – construction of reasons of Tribunal – whether Tribunal turned its mind to the central issue in contention – effect of reading reasons as a whole
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33, 43, 44 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 4 Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 (Cth) ss 3, 10, 10(7), 26, 78 Workers' Compensation Act 1951 (ACT) s 7
Cases cited: Cadbury UK Ltd v Registrar of Trademarks (2008) 316 ALD 608 Comcare v Martin (2016) 258 CLR 467 Comcare v Porter (1996) 70 FCR 139 Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Dalton v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 160 CLR 246 Department of Veterans' Affairs v Studdert [2001] FCA 1642 Hume Steel Ltd v Peart (1947) 75 CLR 242 Kennedy Cleaning Services Pty Ltd v Petkoska (2000) 200 CLR 286 Lawrance v Centrelink (2005) 88 ALD 664 May v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission (2015) 233 FCR 397 Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission v May (2016) 257 CLR 468 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 at 271–272 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Prain v Comcare [2017] FCAFC 143 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme (2003) 216 CLR 212 Re Ruddock; ex parte S154/2002 (2003) 201 ALR 437 Sullivan v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2014) 226 FCR 555 Sun v Minister For Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 243 FCR 220 Wong v Law Institute of Australia [2014] VSC 136 Zickar v MGH Plastic Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 187 CLR 310
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate