Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Giddings v Australian Information Commissioner [2017] FCAFC 225 Appeal from: Giddings v Australian Information Commissioner [2017] FCA 677
File number: ACD 54 of 2017
Judges: COLLIER, FLICK AND CHARLESWORTH JJ
Date of judgment: 21 December 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – freedom of information – where delegate of the Information Commissioner decided not to continue with review – where decision of the Information Commissioner set aside on review – no error exposed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether order should have been made for the proceedings to be held in camera pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – where onus on appellant to establish that order should be made – whether such an order was "necessary" in the circumstances – apprehended bias – whether claim of apprehended bias "firmly established" – whether allegations of bias irresponsibly advanced TORTS – misfeasance in public office – elements of the tort of misfeasance in public officer – whether administrative decision-maker's action pursued with knowledge or reckless indifference as to whether it was in excess of power – whether administrative decision-maker's action pursued with malice
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 16 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 17, 37AF(1), 37AG, 50 (repealed) Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) ss 54W, 55K Federal Court Rules 2011(Cth) r 36.01(2)(c)
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 43 FLR 129 Beaudesert Shire Council v Smith (1966) 120 CLR 145 Computer Interchange Pty Ltd v Microsoft Corporation [1999] FCA 198, (1999) 88 FCR 438 Dowling v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 28 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63, (2000) 205 CLR 337 Fernance v Nominal Defendant (1989) 17 NSWLR 710 Giddings v Australian Information Commissioner [2017] FCA 677 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21, (2010) 240 CLR 651 Hogan v Hinch [2011] HCA 4, (2011) 243 CLR 506 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Lock v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2016] FCA 31, (2016) 248 FCR 547 Macksville & District Hospital v Mayze (1987) 10 NSWLR 708 Northern Territory of Australia v Mengel (1995) 185 CLR 307 Outboard Marine Australia Pty Ltd v Byrnes [1974] 1 NSWLR 27 Park Oh Ho v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 20 FCR 104 Park Oh Ho v Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 167 CLR 637 Porter v OAMPS Ltd [2005] FCA 232, (2005) 215 ALR 327 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Repacholi Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2009] FCA 1487, (2009) 263 ALR 93 Rush v Commissioner of Police [2006] FCA 12, (2006) 150 FCR 165 Sanders v Snell (1998) 196 CLR 329
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate