Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Migration Agents Registration Authority v Frugtniet [2018] FCAFC 5 Appeal from: Frugtniet v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2017] FCA 537
File number: VID 704 of 2017
Judges: SIOPIS, ROBERTSON AND BROMWICH JJ
Date of judgment: 30 January 2018
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal against orders made by primary judge setting aside Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) decision which affirmed appellant's cancellation of respondent's registration as a migration agent – whether penalty privilege was available to respondent in his AAT proceedings Held: if penalty privilege is to apply in a non-curial setting, it must have a basis in the language of the relevant statute – penalty privilege was not available to the respondent in his AAT proceedings – appeal allowed and orders of the primary judge set aside – leave refused to the respondent to rely on his further amended notice of contention
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33(1)(a), 37, 61(2), 62(4) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 81 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 155, (1), (7) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Part 3, ss 308, 309, 310 Royal Commissions Act 1902 (Cth) s 14(2) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 155, (1), (2), (7) Commissions of Inquiry Act of 1950 (Qld) Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic) s 105
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mining Projects Group Ltd [2007] FCA 1620; 164 FCR 32 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Plymin [2002] VSC 56; 4 VR 168 Bropho v Western Australia [1990] HCA 24; 171 CLR 1 CSR Limited v Eddy [2005] HCA 64; 226 CLR 1 Coco v The Queen [1994] HCA 15; 179 CLR 427 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 3; 188 CLR 501 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 21; 256 CLR 375 Cornwell v The Queen [2007] HCA 12; 231 CLR 260 Coshott v Burke [2017] FCAFC 230 Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] HCA 49; 213 CLR 543 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89 Griffin v Pantzer [2004] FCAFC 113; 137 FCR 209 MH6 v Mental Health Review Board [2009] VSCA 184; 25 VR 382 Police Service Board v Morris [1985] HCA 9; 156 CLR 397 Potter v Minahan [1908] HCA 63; 7 CLR 277 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1983] HCA 9; 152 CLR 328 Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane [1987] HCA 12; 162 CLR 514 Re Drake and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (No 2) (1979) 2 ALD 634 Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2004] HCA 42; 220 CLR 129 Sorby v Commonwealth [1983] HCA 10; 152 CLR 281 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 52; 243 FCR 20 Towie v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria [2008] VSCA 157; 29 VAR 252 Valantine v Technical and Further Education Commission [2007] NSWCA 208; 166 IR 459
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate