Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Attorney-General v Helicopter-Tjungarrayi (Ngurra Kayanta & Ngurra Kayanta #2) [2018] FCAFC 35 Appeal from: Helicopter Tjungarrayi on behalf of the Ngurra Kayanta People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 587 Helicopter Tjungarrayi on behalf of the Ngurra Kayanta People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2017] FCA 938
File number(s): WAD 442 of 2017 WAD 444 of 2017
Judge(s): NORTH, JAGOT AND RANGIAH JJ
Date of judgment: 16 March 2018
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – s 47B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the NTA) – whether petroleum exploration permits granted under State legislation are "mining leases" – permits held to be mining leases for the purposes of s 47B(1)(b)(i) of the NTA – s 47B excluded from operation – State's appeal allowed NATIVE TITLE – s 47B(1)(b)(ii) of the NTA – whether exploration permits mean part of claim area is covered by a permission or authority under which land is to be used for a particular purpose – consideration of nature and purpose of use and the extent of the land to be used under exploration permits – exploration permits do not satisfy s 47B(1)(b)(ii) – Commonwealth's appeal dismissed
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 47B, 228, 242, 243, 244, 245, 253, 247, 247A, 248, 248A, 249A Mining Act 1978 (WA) ss 46, 63, 85, 113 Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (WA) ss 15, 38, 90, 91B, 95, 97, 117
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate