Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BJB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 49 Appeal from: BJB16 v Minister for Immigration [2017] FCCA 2367
File number: VID 1179 of 2017
Judges: KENNY, MCKERRACHER AND WHITE JJ
Date of judgment: 29 March 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority to affirm the delegate's decision not to grant a protection visa – whether denial of procedural fairness transpired in the delegate's decision-making process which could not be remedied by the Authority – whether it was legally unreasonable for the Authority to fail to remit the matter to the Minister – where there was a failure by the appellant to adduce evidence to demonstrate an inability to meaningfully participate – whether the Authority has the jurisdiction to assess the authenticity of documents – whether the Authority can reach a different finding on authenticity than that of the delegate
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(1), 5J(1)(a), 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 65, 91W, 425, 473BC, 473CA, 473CC, 473DC, 473DD, 473DD(b), 476 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 4.43
Cases cited: BMB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 169 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNVW (2010) 183 FCR 575 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v SZFDE (2006) 154 FCR 365 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SCAR (2003) 128 FCR 553 SZMSA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 34
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate