Minister for Home Affairs v SZRWS [2018] FCAFC 51

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Minister for Home Affairs v SZRWS [2018] FCAFC 51 Appeal from: SZRWS v Minister for Immigration [2017] FCCA 3101

File number: NSD 73 of 2018

Judges: FLICK, ROBERTSON AND GRIFFITHS JJ

Date of judgment: 6 April 2018

Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from grant of interlocutory injunction – whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused, supposing the decision to be wrong – Held: Leave to appeal refused

Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15C Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 8 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 75 Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) ss 10(1), 18 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(1), 273, 474, 476 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.35, 36.57

Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46; 227 CLR 57 Australian Securities Commission v Somerville (1994) 51 FCR 38 Bienstein v Bienstein [2003] HCA 7; 195 ALR 225 Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2007] HCA 14; 228 CLR 651 Brilliant Digital Entertainment Pty Ltd v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 270; 63 IPR 373 Fencott v Muller [1983] HCA 12; 152 CLR 570 Fernando v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1203; 165 FCR 471 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd [2000] FCA 1572; 104 FCR 564 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v ARJ17 [2017] FCAFC 125; 250 FCR 474 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238 SZRWS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCCA 3101 Tyne (Trustee) v UBS AG [2016] FCA 241; 338 ALR 624 SZSZM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCCA 819; 321 FLR 162