Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Matson v United States of America [2018] FCAFC 57 Appeal from: Matson v United States of America [2016] FCA 1245
File numbers: QUD 569 of 2016 QUD 844 of 2016 QUD 51 of 2017
Judges: DOWSETT, WIGNEY AND BROMWICH JJ
Date of judgment: 13 April 2018
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – request by United States of America for extradition of appellant from Australia – appeal from dismissal of application for review of magistrate's order that appellant be committed to prison under s 19(9) Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) to await surrender or release – whether primary judge erred in finding that extradition request met requirements of s 19(2)(b) Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) and Article XI(3)(c) Treaty on Extradition between Australia and United States – adequacy of supporting documents – whether Article XI(3)(c) required affidavit setting forth reasonable grounds for believing that the person for whom the extradition was sought had committed an offence under United States law – appeal dismissed – application pursuant to s 39B Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – application for review of decision of Minister for Justice to issue notice pursuant to s 16 Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – whether Minister failed to consider delay of prosecution authorities in bringing extradition request – whether delay amounted to abuse of process or fraud on extradition power – whether Minister can consider delay at s 16 stage of extradition process – whether Minister had duty to inquire into delay – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – rejection of tender of irrelevant documents – where evidence concerned matters not before Minister
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate