Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 78 Appeal from: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 113; (2015) 323 ALR 429
File number: NSD 242 of 2015
Judges: GREENWOOD, MIDDLETON AND FOSTER JJ
Date of judgment: 25 May 2018
Catchwords: COMPETITION – appeal by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission against an order of the Federal Court dismissing a proceeding against Pfizer in which the ACCC alleged that Pfizer had contravened s 46 and s 47(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) when it took certain steps pursuant to a plan designed to enable Pfizer to compete in the market for the wholesale supply of a pharmaceutical (atorvastatin) to community pharmacies in Australia after the expiry of the Australian patent for atorvastatin held by Pfizer COMPETITION – misuse of market power – whether the primary judge erred in market definition – whether the respondent had a substantial degree of market power in the relevant market – whether the respondent took advantage of its market power – whether the respondent had the purpose of "deterring" a person from engaging in competitive conduct in the atorvastatin market – whether the ACCC's case as pleaded was legally incoherent COMPETITION – exclusive dealing – whether the respondent supplied upon "condition" – whether the respondent had the purpose of substantially "hindering" competition in the atorvastatin market – whether s 51(3) defence was established
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 4A, 4E, 4F, 4G, 46, 46A, 47, 48, 51 and 76 National Health Act 1953 (Cth), s 90 Patents Act 1990 (Cth), ss 13, 117 and 144 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 45, 46 and 51
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate