Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Homart Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v Careline Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 105 Appeal from: Homart Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v Careline Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 403
File number: NSD 661 of 2017
Judges: MURPHY, GLEESON AND MARKOVIC JJ
Date of judgment: 5 July 2018
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – appeal – whether primary judge erred in finding packaging and get-up of appellant's cosmetic products misleadingly or deceptively similar to that of respondent's products – where different brand name present, but packaging otherwise similar – significance of lack of evidence of consumer confusion – characterisation of conduct as irrelevant third-party conduct – whether principle in Australian Woollen Mills Limited v FS Walton & Co Limited [1937] HCA 51; (1938) 58 CLR 641 properly applied – whether variants of products impermissibly conflated – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) ss 18, 232 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24A Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140
Cases cited: 260 Oxford Street Pty Ltd v Premetis [2006] NSWCA 96 Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd [2018] FCAFC 93 Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Anying Group Pty Ltd v Wang [2012] FCA 702 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634; (2014) 317 ALR 73 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Ltd [1999] FCA 1387; (1999) 95 FCR 114 Australian Woollen Mills Limited v FS Walton & Co Limited [1937] HCA 51; (1938) 58 CLR 641 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833; (2001) 117 FCR 424 Bridge Stockbrokers Ltd & Moore v Bridges & Ors [1984] FCA 430; (1984) 4 FCR 460 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 4) [2006] FCA 446; (2006) 69 IPR 23 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 8) [2008] FCA 470; (2008) 75 IPR 557 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 70; (2007) 159 FCR 397 Chase Manhattan Overseas Corp v Chase Corp Limited (1986) 12 FCR 375 Computer Edge Pty Ltd v Apple Computer Inc [1984] HCA 47; (1984) 54 ALR 767 Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 448 Facton v Toast Sales Group [2012] FCA 612; (2012) 98 IPR 13 Flexopack SA Plastics Industry v Flexopack Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 235 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118 Homart Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v Careline Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 403 Hornsby Building Information Centre Ltd Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd [1978] HCA 11; (1978) 140 CLR 216 ICI Australian Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1992] FCA 707; (1992) 38 FCR 248 JB Williams Co v H Bronnley & Co Ltd (1909) 26 RPC 765 Landsal Pty Ltd v REI Building Society [1993] FCA 171; (1993) 41 FCR 421 Miki Shoko Co Ltd v Merv Brown Pty Ltd (1988) ATPR 40-858 NZI Securities Australia Ltd v Poignand [1994] FCA 46; (1994) 51 FCR 584 Oliver Hume South East Queensland Pty Ltd v Investa Residential Group Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 141; (2017) 348 ALR 385 Paragon Shoes Pty Ltd v Paragini Distributors (NSW) Pty Ltd [1988] FCA 647; (1988) 13 IPR 323 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44; (1982) 149 CLR 191 Pasqualotto v Pasqualotto [2013] VSCA 21 Payton & Co v Snelling, Lampard & Co Ltd (1900) 17 RPC 48 Precision Plastics Pty Ltd v Demir [1975] HCA 27; (1975) 132 CLR 362 Red Bull Australia Pty Limited v Sydneywide Distributors Pty Limited [2001] FCA 1228; (2001) 53 IPR 481 Ricegrowers Ltd v Real Foods [2008] FCA 639; (2008) 77 IPR 32 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 158; (2011) 217 FCR 238 SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Ltd [2015] FCA 787; 114 IPR 231 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd [1987] 10 NSWLR 247 Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 157; (2002) 234 FCR 549 Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd [1982] FCA 170; (1982) 42 ALR 177 TAG Pacific Ltd v McSweeney [1992] FCA 191; (1992) 34 FCR 438 Telmak Teleproducts (Australia) Pty Ltd v Coles Myer Ltd (1989) 89 ALR 48 Telstra Corporation Limited v Phone Directories Company Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 568 Verrocchi v Direct Chemist Outlet Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 104; (2016) 247 FCR 570 WH Burford & Sons Ltd v G Mowling & Son [1909] HCA 83; (1908) 8 CLR 212 Woodtree Pty Ltd v Zheng [2007] FCA 1922; (2007) 164 FCR 369
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate