Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stefanovski v Digital Central Australia (Assets) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 113 Appeal from: Digital Central Australia (Assets) Pty Ltd v Stefanovski (No 2) [2017] FCA 1000
File number(s): QUD 426 of 2017
Judge(s): MCKERRACHER, ROBERTSON AND DERRINGTON JJ
Date of judgment: 18 July 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – where appellant partially successful on appeal – where injunctions initially awarded narrowed on appeal – costs sought in relation to interlocutory applications – costs awarded accordingly
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Digital Central Australia (Assets) Pty Ltd v Stefanovski (No 2) [2017] FCA 1000 GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Limited v Generic Partners Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 100 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 Stefanovski v Digital Central Australia (Assets) Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 31
Date of hearing: 3 November 2017
Date of last submissions: 5 April 2018
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Appellants: Mr S Couper QC and Mr P Afshar
Solicitor for the Appellants: KB Legals
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C J Crawford
Solicitor for the Respondent: Rouse Lawyers
ORDERS QUD 426 of 2017
BETWEEN: TOME STEFANOVSKI First Appellant
KYLIE CLARK Second Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate