Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116 Appeal from: Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 3
File number: NSD 100 of 2018
Judges: REEVES, RANGIAH AND COLVIN JJ
Date of judgment: 2 August 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision of primary judge upholding decision not to revoke the cancellation of a visa on character grounds - where appellant made representations about revocation of the cancellation decision to the Minister - where representations concerned hardship to partner and child if appellant had to relocate - whether Minister failed to consider the difficulties the appellant's partner would suffer if the family were relocated - whether appellant denied procedural fairness by failure to consider a substantial argument, claim or submission made to the Minister - appeal allowed - matter remitted to the Minister for determination according to law
Legislation: Constitution s 75(v) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A, 501CA, 501(3A)
Cases cited: Ali v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 650 BCR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 96; (2017) 248 FCR 456 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 Finance Facilities Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1971] HCA 12; (1971) 127 CLR 106 Forrest & Forrest Pty Ltd v Wilson [2017] HCA 30 Goundar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1203 Julius v Lord Bishop of Oxford (1880) 5 App Cas 214 Leach v The Queen [2007] HCA 3; (2007) 230 CLR 1 Marzano v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 66; (2017) 250 FCR 548 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BHA17 [2018] FCAFC 68 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS (2014) 309 ALR 67 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40; (2015) 256 CLR 326 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT (2013) 212 FCR 99 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Muggeridge v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 200 MZYTS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 230 FCR 431 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 Parker v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 115 Picard v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1430 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth (2010) 243 CLR 319 Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; (2003) 214 CLR 1 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54; (1986) 161 CLR 141 Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 51; (2015) 257 CLR 22
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate