Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Ly [2018] FCAFC 123 Appeal from: Ly v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 409
File number: NSD 541 of 2018
Judges: RARES, ROBERTSON AND FARRELL JJ
Date of judgment: 8 August 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia – judicial review by that Court of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision refusing prospective marriage visas – Tribunal noting review applicant had not provided evidence of hotel stays in Cambodia with her intended spouse – hotel receipts subsequently provided – Tribunal finding that although receipts were dated different years they appeared to be in the same handwriting and doubting genuineness of the receipts and giving little weight to them – whether genuineness of the receipts was an issue that should have been raised with review applicant either pursuant to s 360 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) or by virtue of procedural fairness under the general law
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 360
Cases cited: Commissioner for ACT Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 1074; 49 FCR 576 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CZBP [2014] FCAFC 105 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZKTI [2009] HCA 30; 238 CLR 489 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMOK [2009] FCAFC 83; 247 FCR 404 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; 228 CLR 152 WAJR v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 106; 204 ALR 624
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate