Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AVQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 133 Appeal from: AVQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCCA 893
File number: VID 1420 of 2017
Judges: KENNY, GRIFFITHS AND MORTIMER JJ
Date of judgment: 13 September 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where the Refugee Review Tribunal (Tribunal) found that the appellant had provided inconsistent information in his statutory declaration and his oral claims to the Tribunal – where the appellant stated in his statutory declaration that it was a "summary" and "not an exhaustive statement" of his claims and that he will provide further information of his claims during his interview with a Departmental officer – where the Tribunal did not refer to the transcript of the interview between the appellant and a Departmental officer in its reasons for decision – whether the primary judge erred in failing to find that the Tribunal engaged in irrational or illogical reasoning, or constructively failed to exercise its jurisdiction, or failed to carry out its statutory tasks by failing to consider relevant information in concluding that the appellant had given inconsistent evidence – whether the primary judge erred in failing to find that the Tribunal constructively failed to exercise its jurisdiction, or failed to carry out its statutory tasks, by failing to consider information concerning prison conditions in Sri Lanka in concluding there was not a real risk that the appellant would be subjected to treatment constituting significant harm for the purposes of s 36(2)(aa) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Held: appeal allowed, with costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate