Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pleash (Liquidator) v Tucker [2018] FCAFC 144 Appeal from: Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 3) [2017] FCA 1074
File number: QUD 2 of 2018
Judges: MCKERRACHER, FARRELL AND BANKS-SMITH JJ
Date of judgment: 29 August 2018
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - appeal from refusal to order production of documents under s 597(9) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - liquidators' examination - where liquidators sought to assess means of examinee to pay prospective debt - where examinee is beneficiary or object of discretionary trusts and director of corporate trustees - whether control exception applied where beneficiary controls the distribution of trust assets - whether income and capital of trusts and third parties otherwise relevant to examinable affairs - whether liquidators established basis for asserting potential to trace funds into trusts - relevance of Pt VI Div 4A of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) to prospect of payment
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Part VI Division 4A Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 596A, 597(9), 1323 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 27 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 20.31
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey (No 6) [2006] FCA 814; (2006) 153 FCR 509 Boys v Quigley [2002] WASCA 99; (2002) 26 WAR 454 DKLR Holding Co (No 2) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [1980] 1 NSWLR 510 Dwyer v Ross [1992] FCA 20; (1992) 34 FCR 463 Fordyce v Ryan [2016] QSC 307; (2017) 2 Qd R 240 Freeman v National Australia Bank [2003] FCAFC 200 Gerah Imports Pty Ltd v Duke Group Ltd (in liq) (1993) 61 SASR 557; (1993) 116 FLR 479 Grosvenor Hill (Queensland) Pty Ltd v Barber [1994] FCA 59; (1994) 48 FCR 301 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Inland Revenue Commissioners v Trustees of Sir John Aird's Settlement [1982] 2 All ER 929 Kennon v Spry [2008] HCA 56; (2008) 238 CLR 366 Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2017] FCA 16 Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 2) [2017] FCA 758; (2017) 122 ACSR 299 Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 3) [2017] FCA 1074 Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd (No 9) [2011] FCA 1483 Swishette Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2017] FCAFC 45; (2017) 249 FCR 483 Wainter Pty Ltd, in the matter of New Tel Limited (in liq) [2005] FCAFC 114; (2005) 221 ALR 331; (2005) 145 FCR 176
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate