Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZLPH V Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 145 Appeal from: SZLPH V Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 231
File number: NSD 251 of 2018
Judges: BESANKO, GLEESON AND BURLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 29 August 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia decision to dismiss application for review of delegate's decision to refuse request to waive visa condition – application for leave to rely on amended notice of appeal – whether proposed grounds meritorious – no failure to take into account medical evidence of appellant's Australian wife's psychological state, or denial of procedural fairness in delegate not informing appellant of unfavourable evaluation of this evidence and inviting comment – no denial of procedural fairness in delegate not informing appellant of insufficiency of evidence regarding risks of return to Pakistan and inviting comment – leave refused – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) r 2.05, Sch 8 Condition 8503
Cases cited: Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14; (1999) 197 CLR 510 ARK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 825 Comcare v Wuth [2018] FCAFC 13 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 293; (1994) 49 FCR 576 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration & Border Protection v SZSSJ [2016] HCA 29; (2016) 259 CLR 180 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CQW17 [2018] FCAFC 110 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS [2013] FCAFC 114; (2013) 203 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16; (2014) 309 ALR 67 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; (2013) 212 FCR 99 MZYPO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCAFC 1 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 38; (2014) 220 FCR 1 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50; (2015) 258 CLR 173 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney (2012) 207 FCR 277; [2012] FCAFC 146 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 52; (2016) 243 FCR 220 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CLR 152 SZLPH v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 231 Taulahi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 177; (2016) 246 FCR 146 VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158; (2004) 238 FCR 588 Yaacoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 39
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate