Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 162 Appeal from: Binu Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 381
File number(s): NSD 329 of 2018
Judge(s): GREENWOOD ACJ, CHARLESWORTH AND O'CALLAGHAN JJ
Date of judgment: 27 September 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court affirming decision of Tribunal – decision not to revoke cancellation of appellant's Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) (Subclass 187) visa following a "dob in" letter from a sponsor employer – whether Tribunal erred by failing to comply with s 359A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by failing to communicate certain information in dob in letter – where evidence that appellant knew contents of dob in letter and gave evidence in reply to delegate and Tribunal – where the information in dob in letter not conveyed to appellant was exculpatory and would not have been a reason to affirm the decision of the delegate – finding that Tribunal had no obligations under s 359A in relation to the dob in letter – appeal dismissed MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court affirming decision of Tribunal – decision not to permit appellant's husband to be joined as a party to proceedings – where husband granted visa as part of appellant's family unit – where husband's visa automatically cancelled with appellant's visa under s 137T of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the delegate's decision to cancel the appellant's visa gave husband rights under s 338(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – finding that the husband's visa was cancelled by force of statute – no administrative decision had been made with respect to husband – appeal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate