Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Egan [2018] FCAFC 169 Appeal from: Egan v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (Citizenship) [2017] AATA 2705
File number: NSD 2261 of 2017 NSD 1395 of 2018
Judges: ALLSOP CJ, PERRAM AND JAGOT JJ
Date of judgment: 9 October 2018
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal on question of law under s 44 of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether Tribunal failed to take account of a mandatory relevant consideration – whether grant of ex-citizen visa under Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 35(3) was mandatory relevant consideration – where Tribunal set aside decision of Minister to cancel citizenship – where Tribunal accepted that Respondent would be repatriated if citizenship cancelled ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of Tribunal under s 39B of Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – whether writs should be issued – where appeal from Tribunal concurrently pursued
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43, 44 Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) ss 3, 5, 21, 34 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 35, 500, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: Bushell v Repatriation Commission [1992] HCA 47; 175 CLR 408 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BHA17 [2018] FCAFC 68 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Tran [2015] FCA 546; 232 FCR 540 Sharp Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd v Collector of Customs [1995] FCA 707; 59 FCR 6 TRHL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 376
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate