Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DFE16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 177 Appeal from: DFE16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCCA 308
File number: NSD 427 of 2017
Judges: REEVES, RANGIAH AND COLVIN JJ
Date of judgment: 16 October 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from unsuccessful application to Federal Circuit Court for judicial review of decision by Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming refusal to grant protection visa - where Tribunal held no real chance of serious harm - whether primary judge erred in finding Tribunal had considered all relevant circumstances - whether Tribunal failed to consider extent of chance of harm together with factors personal to appellant when considering whether relocation would be reasonable - whether primary judge erred in finding Tribunal did not have to consider matters under UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines for Assessing the International Protection Needs of Asylum-Seekers from Afghanistan - consideration of relevant principles regarding failure to consider a matter raised in the context of an application for a protection visa - consideration of principles regarding relocation - no jurisdictional error - appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36 Migration Amendment (Complementary Protection) Act 2011 (Cth) Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Act 2014 (Cth)
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; (1990) 170 CLR 1 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS [2013] FCAFC 114; (2013) 230 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSCA [2014] HCA 45; (2014) 254 CLR 317 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRMA [2013] FCAFC 161; (2013) 219 FCR 287 MZACX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1212 MZYQU v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1032; (2012) 206 FCR 191 MZZJY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1394 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 NAVK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1695 SZATV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 40; (2007) 233 CLR 18 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate