Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DZY17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCAFC 196 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal from: DZY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 1987
File number: VID 883 of 2018
Judge: BESANKO, GRIFFITHS AND WHITE JJ
Date of judgment: 14 November 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for leave to appeal from a judgment and orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCCA) – where the applicant filed a judicial review application in the FCCA in respect of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) refusing to grant her a protection visa – where the applicant discontinued that judicial review application and, on that same day, filed a second judicial review application in the FCCA in respect of the same AAT decision – where the applicant did not disclose the existence of the first judicial review application in her second judicial review application, in breach of s 486D of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the primary judge erred in determining that s 486D imposed a jurisdictional precondition to the commencement of the second judicial review application such that the failure to comply with the disclosure requirement meant that the FCCA lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the second judicial review application PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from a judgment and orders of the FCCA – whether the primary judge's decision is attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration – whether substantial injustice would result to the applicant if leave to appeal were refused, supposing the decision to be wrong
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24(1A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 486D Migration Litigation Reform Act 2005 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate