Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Registered Organisations Commissioner [No 2] [2018] FCAFC 203 Appeal from: Registered Organisations Commissioner v Transport Workers' Union of Australia [2018] FCA 32
File number: NSD 232 of 2018
Judges: ALLSOP CJ, COLLIER AND RANGIAH JJ
Date of judgment: 21 November 2018
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – admitted contraventions by appellant of certain provisions of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) – departure by primary judge from the parties' common position that a single penalty should be imposed for the contraventions of s 172(1) and a single penalty should be imposed for the contraventions of s 231(1) – failure to disclose proposed departure from that common position – cannot be said that giving the appellant the opportunity to respond to proposed departure could not have changed outcome – procedural fairness – refixing of penalties Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth), ss 5, 172(1), 231(1), 235(2), 306, 315(2) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), s 557(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 28(1)(b)
Cases cited: Assistant Commissioner Michael James Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 7; 252 CLR 38 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Agreed Penalties Case) [2017] FCAFC 113; 254 FCR 68 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 159; ATPR 42-557 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; 357 ALR 55 Bass v Permanent Trustee Company Limited [1999] HCA 9; 198 CLR 334 Best v The Queen [2015] VSCA 151; 46 VR 196 Betts v The Queen [2016] HCA 25; 258 CLR 420 Carroll v The Queen [2009] HCA 13; 254 CLR 259 Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha [2017] FCA 876; 254 FCR 235 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Non-Indemnification Personal Payment Case) [2018] FCAFC 97 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; 269 ALR 1 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Williams [2009] FCAFC 171; 262 ALR 417 DL v The Queen [2018] HCA 32; 92 ALJR 764 Fardon v Attorney-General for the State of Queensland [2004] HCA 46; 223 CLR 575 Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [No 2] [2018] FCAFC 53; 356 ALR 389 International Finance Trust Company Limited v New South Wales Crime Commission [2009] HCA 49; 240 CLR 319 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Kuczborski v The State of Queensland [2014] HCA 46; 254 CLR 51 Nicholas v The Queen [1998] HCA 9; 193 CLR 173 Nobarani v Mariconte [2018] HCA 36; 92 ALJR 806 North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Limited v Northern Territory of Australia [2015] HCA 41; 256 CLR 569 R v Beary [2004] VSCA 229; 11 VR 151 R v Jones [2004] VSCA 68 R v Rademeyer (1985) 1 NSWLR 285 R v Rider [1954] 1 WLR 463 Re Nolan; Ex Parte Young [1991] HCA 29; 172 CLR 460 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57; 204 CLR 82 Southam v Southam [1950] VLR 203 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54; 161 CLR 141 Wainohu v New South Wales [2011] HCA 24; 243 CLR 181
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate