Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commissioner of Taxation v Cassaniti [2018] FCAFC 212 Appeal from: Cassaniti v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 92
File number: NSD 334 of 2018
Judges: GREENWOOD, LOGAN, STEWARD JJ
Date of judgment: 30 November 2018
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – withholding payments – where primary judge found respondent was entitled to a credit for amounts said to be withheld from salary or wages paid to her pursuant to s 18-15(1) of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – whether primary judge erred in accepting the veracity of the respondent's purported PAYG payment summaries, payslips and written offers of employment – where Commissioner of Taxation contended that the documents had either not been properly proven or were a recent invention – whether respondent had been given proper notice of the contention of recent invention – whether primary judge erred in failing to draw an inference from respondent's failure to call certain witnesses
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 286, 1305 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 4, 58, 136, 140, 164, 167 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 190 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 995-1 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B, 64, 80 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 14ZZ, 14ZZK, 14ZZO Sch 1 ss 12-35, 16-5, 16-70, 16-140, 16-150, 16-155, 16-170, 18-15
Cases cited: Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd [2018] FCAFC 93 Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 1) (2012) 207 FCR 448 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar (2012) 247 CLR 345 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Flugge (No 10) [2015] VSC 690 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWSC 417; 216 ALR 320 Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67 Caratti v The Queen (2000) 22 WAR 527 Cassaniti v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 186 FCR 480 Cassaniti v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 642; 79 ATR 378 Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Labrador Liquor Wholesale Pty Ltd (2003) 216 CLR 161 Commissioner of Taxation v Australia and New Zealand Savings Bank Ltd (1994) 181 CLR 466 Currie v Dempsey (1967) 69 SR (NSW) 116 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Dickinson v Minister of Pensions [1953] 1 QB 228 Fabre v Arenales (1992) 27 NSWLR 437 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Wade (1951) 84 CLR 105 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Gauci v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 135 CLR 81 Guest v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 193; 65 ATR 815 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kenny v State of South Australia (1987) 46 SASR 268 Kordan Pty Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 1807; 46 ATR 191 Linfox Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd v Arthur Yates & Co Ltd [2003] NSWSC 876; 47 ACSR 261 MWJ v The Queen [2005] HCA 74; 80 ALJR 329 Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead (1912) 15 CLR 333 National Australia Bank Ltd v Rusu (1999) 47 NSWLR 309 Pascoe v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1956) 30 ALJR 402; 11 ATD 108 Perdikaris v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2008) 172 FCR 412 Rio Tinto Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCA 335; 55 ATR 321 Robinson Helicopter Co Inc v McDermott [2016] HCA 22; 90 ALJR 679 Visy Packaging Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 1195; 91 ATR 810 Shord v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2017) 253 FCR 157 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate