Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
EVA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 214 Appeal from: EVA17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 1048
File number(s): NSD 899 of 2018
Judge(s): PERRY, DERRINGTON AND WHEELAHAN JJ
Date of judgment: 28 November 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – protection visa – whether Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider an integer of the applicant's claim – whether finding of absence of occurrence of threat to applicant rendered it unnecessary to consider other sources of fear of harm – whether finding on specific and relevant integer subsumed in general finding which does not mention integer
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: BZAFB v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 995 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 NAJT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 147 FCR 51 Nobarani v Moriconte [2018] HCA 36 S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 195 SZTRY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 86 VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 238 FCR 588 WAAD v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 399 WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate