Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rodchompoo v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCAFC 215 Appeal from: Rodchompoo v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 965
File number: WAD 321 of 2018
Judges: BARKER, PERRY AND BANKS-SMITH JJ
Date of judgment: 28 November 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Court of Australia – where appellant's class BF transitional (permanent) visa cancelled on character grounds pursuant to s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs refused to revoke visa cancellation – where Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision – where primary judge dismissed application for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision – where appellant's adjournment request in this Court refused – where Tribunal's decision adopted much of Minister's written submission – whether error disclosed in reasons of primary judge – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Constitution Ch III Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 500(1)(ba), 501(3A), 501(6), 501(7), 501CA(4) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Falzon v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 351 ALR 61; [2018] HCA 2 Juneja and Anor v Tax Practitioners Board (2017) 72 AAR 407; [2017] FCA 908 LVR (WA) Pty Ltd and Another v Administrative Appeals Tribunal and Another (2012) 203 FCR 166; [2012] FCAFC 90 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li and Another (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Toura v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1405
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate