Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coshott v Prentice (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 221 Appeal from: Coshott v Prentice, in the matter of Coshott (No 2) [2016] FCA 1531 Prentice v Fewin Pty Limited, in the matter of Prentice [2017] FCA 490
File numbers: NSD 1 of 2017 NSD 2 of 2017 NSD 788 of 2017
Judges: KERR, FARRELL AND GLEESON JJ
Date of judgment: 5 December 2018
Catchwords: COSTS – application for lump sum costs order in relation to three appeals – where appeals heard together – whether lump sum costs are appropriate – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 40.02(b)
Cases cited: Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) [1995] FCA 350; 57 FCR 119 Coshott v Prentice [2018] FCAFC 179 Hudson v Sigalla (No 2) [2017] FCA 339 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 403
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 29 November 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Solicitor for the Appellants: Mr J Lyons of Murphy Lyons Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J T Johnson
ORDERS NSD 1 of 2017
BETWEEN: JAMES SINCLAIR COSHOTT Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate